Anyone on 1024 resolution ?

• Articles
• Chatterbot Collection
• Downloads
• Gallery
• Links
• Member's Projects

[Today]

• Spykee Chatbot by Freddy [Today at 03:07:19 PM]
• What's everyone up to ? by GeekCaveCreations [September 09, 2010, 04:51:49 PM]
• High speed robotic hand by Art [September 08, 2010, 07:06:11 PM]
• Robots: Programmable Matt... by Tyler [September 07, 2010, 06:00:14 PM]
• Windows 7 - 3D rendering ... by fandaor [September 06, 2010, 08:28:53 PM]
• How would you test? by Datahopa [September 06, 2010, 04:12:58 PM]
• Virtual Woman by Art [September 06, 2010, 03:18:44 PM]

14 Guests, 0 Users

Xen Quote

Posted by Datahopa

AAAI.ORG BBC Sci-Tech BBC Technology Kurzweil AI MIT Tech Review New Scientist Robots.net

A spirit lingers in this adult tale of the Digital Girl by Maviarab.

Chapter 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
This story is not intended for minors.

[Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.Did you miss your activation email?]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

September 10, 2010, 07:43:08 PM

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[GT40]

Thanks for the link, GCC. I will try it. It's strange because I have no scroll bar with 616. Please don't laugh at me, I use Internet Explorer 8 with XP and a 1024x768 monitor. Could you please take a look here:

http://www.ultrahal.com/community/index.php?topic=6601.msg51397#new

I reduced the last pics to 640x480 but I can display a little larger image without any scroll bar for me. Thanks in advance, and thanks again for testing.

[Duskrider]

testing                                                                 testing
ok, not really testing.
Sandee seen Megs pic and wanted her's here too.      

[Carl2]

  I'm using this computer with a 26 inch lcd tv, the resolution is 980 x 768.  scroll bars at the side and bottom.  I remember adjusting the resolution again after some change.  The other computer has a 22 in monitor, 1280 x 980, no scroll bar at the bottom.
Carl2

[GeekCaveCreations]

@Duskrider

Did Sandee get... Um... "Augmented" some more?

[GT40]

[TheMikh28]

I'm on 1280x800 myself, but back when I designed sites, width was typically based on percentages rather than fixed values so that I didn't have to worry about different resolutions.

Then again, I wasn't exactly a professional web designer.

[Duskrider]

GeekCaveCreations,
I don't thnk so, she just a healthy teen.   

[GT40]

You're right TheMikh28, it's a very smart solution.

I guess Freddy will be happy to rewrite the html of the forum (if he has nothing else to do), for the 4 or 5 people who post images here.

[Freddy]

Looks like I should have kept my mouth shut

It was percentage based previously but I changed it to fixed width as some times I need a page to look a certain way and you can't do that with fluid pages that stretch all over the place.

What I will do is offer both options - a fixed width where everything lines up nicely and a widescreen option where people will have to accept whatever gets sent to them lol

Thanks for all the comments, it's amazing what one small change can cause