Tell us what you think of the book after reading it. I got all 3 correct in the video, although the last one was ridiculously lacking in sufficient data to say for certain. In fall 3 were lacking in data. The AI expert was probably looking to much between the lines. It's a bit odd that the guy in the video would use those examples. What notable academic would consider a few questions as a valid means for a Turing test?
Those look like chatbots. Database driven. No offense to anyone, but I don't consider that real AI.
Maybe humans are getting too caught up in having AI be like them. Why? Is that supposed to be such a good thing? It won't be too many more years before AI can do everything humans can do with some silly exceptions such as sex.
Four popular tests:
1. The Turing Test  -  This one is a classic. Developed in 1950 by Alan Turing, a human and a chatbot will have a conversation with an unseen human being, and the unseen human being must evaluate who is the bot and who is the human.
2. The Coffee Test  - In 2007, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak came up with another angle for robots that cannot talk. He made the bold claim that there will never be a robot that can walk into a house, find the kitchen and subsequently the coffee maker, identify the ingredients and tools needed to make a cuppa, and finally figure out how to operate the machine. He argued that these things are learned (to be fair I still cannot make a decent cup of coffee) and not programmed.
3. The Robot College Student Test  -  Another test formulated by Ben Goertzel is the Robot College Student Test. Simply put, the robot has to take all the classes and pass the exams and tests, just like its fellow human classmates. How far are we from achieving this? China’s Chengdu Zhunxingyunxue Technology developed AI-MATHS, which sat for two math tests of China’s notoriously tough national college entrance exams. It passed both exams without the help of the Internet, but its grades were not spectacular, barely passing both exams.
4. The Employment Test  - Computer scientist Nils Nilsson suggested in 2005 an alternative test to the Turing, an employment test to show that “machines exhibiting true human-level intelligence should be able to do many of the things humans are able to doâ€, including human jobs.
