[LOCKSUIT]

To understand AI - learning computer coding language will-NOT-help - because it only codes what you know n want - I already can see the electricity hitting " " and that makes it send " " to " " and then makes a guess by " " ecttttt.

No, once you's know* I have AI, you will use every moment of your day to support me and build it so we all become immortal fast.

Btw, above, yet again, I asked for permission to post the gut explanation in my next reply, and look what ivan says "Gosh blahblahblah"...and still I presented that I sent him a new front cover instead of the gut explanation in writing, I may post the image somewhere, I suggest you give me your email to email you this next front cover (of next video, it alone explains all 100% undeniable". You don't know what I know, the joy and what awaits, hurry and do what I asked you.

[LOCKSUIT]

I read it all, but i have proof.

[LOCKSUIT]

---

[ivan.moony]

I'm sorry for being rude in my last two posts (I've deleted them), but you are not such an easy person to deal with, mr.SHC. The other night I had to sedate myself after talking to you. I don't know anymore if it was you or me, but please consider that you are interfacing humans here, not things.

I'll try not to lose my temper again.

peace around me.... ommmmmmmmmmm... peace... peace...

My sincere apologies 

[LOCKSUIT]

---

[LOCKSUIT]

*Now read it [above] (if your not already in awe). I had to fix it.

[ivan.moony]

Mr. SHC did you try to write some 10 page paper? It would be the best if you could organize it in a way of sequential stating the problem you try to solve, following by a solution, one by one? Also try to organize your research in chapters, each dealing with its own subject? Jumping from subject to subject is pretty uneasy to follow.

P.S.
It would be great if you could start from the biggest problem, then divide it to a number of simpler, each of them to a number of simpler, etc.

[8pla.net]

There is vintage A.I. out there which predates the Internet by a long shot.  Well, obviously right?  Alan Turing, Joseph Weizenbaum  and many other A.I. pioneers were around way before the web.   So, I personally do not require proof be posted to the web, because I expect to come across vintage A.I.

There is definitely legacy A.I. running on industrial computing that has been around since long before DOS. The CPU is prototyped with a bundle of wires so thin, they look just like a lock of human hair hanging off an early circuit board. 

For real, I promise there are vintage works of genius A.I. out there.  You tend to come across them in the field every now and then, still working after all these years.

[LOCKSUIT]

--

[ivan.moony]

Ok, but if we want it to be truly intelligent, it should be able to solve math, chemistry and physics problems.

Now how to do that?

[LOCKSUIT]

---

[ivan.moony]

We want the machine to deal with different range of problems. So write a paper about how to solve physics problems (you know it from school, electricity, motion, forces, statics, dynamics and everything else). Don't forget the math and chemistry problems too, as they are equally important to us. Solving logic problems is also very important, so try to write something about that too. If you miss some knowledge, ask, maybe I can point you where to find information you need.

Right now I am working (thinking *sigh*) on the method that tries to solve all noted types of problems using unique rules. The simpler rules are, the more satisfied I am.

We want our bot to be able to predict *any* happening that can happen in the Universe, to conclude everything what can be concluded form gathered knowledge. Happenings are starting from inter-stellar behavior, ranging over weather reports and ending with sub-atomic particle behavior prediction.

And how to deal with living beings? Also a very important subject, maybe the most important of them all. Whom to obey, whom to disobey, whom to help?

A lot of questions for us, many people tried to answer them all, but no one succeeded to provide a simple answer, as long as I know about it.

P.S.
And take a break from thinking, throw a look at other conversations on this site. I recommend "Friday funny" thread, it's very entertaining.

[LOCKSUIT]

--

[ivan.moony]

I agree that a child is born with no experience, but the child got something cosntant - legacy of instinct. That instinct shapes all experiences through variables and I agree that experience is just data which can be whatever happens.

Now the instinct is what I'm particulary interested in. Do you believe you have an instinct solved out? Then please explain it to me in plain english in a research paper that we are all accomodated to. Five sentences is simply not enough to understand it from zero (my instinct isn't that good).

I propose for you to do a test: try to conclude specific solution to a specific problem in the Universe - using only particles that you are trying to explain. That is a common technique to explain something to someone. You pose a theory and then test it through various examples. To fully understand you I need both, explanation of a theory and specific examples that the theory can deal with. One without another poses me in the same starting point you had 1.5 years ago and it would probably took me longer to conclude anything from it.

So if you want to share anything with the world, a research paper with examples would be a common thing to do. Otherwise we get only fragments of your train of thoughts which is very hard to decypher and build up the whole image.

[LOCKSUIT]

--