[kei10]

This topic is about True A.I, ones that resembles human intelligence. It is also about you. If you were to create an A.I, the structure of the A.I could describe what kind of person you are. It is important that a real True A.I must not be abused for anyone's entertainment.

Either way, seeing some people unaware that creating advanced A.I requires the A.I to be able to act and think just like a human being.

Why? Because there are certain extreme situations that even an A.I is required to be decided with critical decision. Situations that matters between right, and wrong -- or/and life, and death... of anything, and that is... moral. So I decided to begin this topic, for a test and gather responses.

Can you, and/or your A.I decide something like this?
Usually given two options from any given questions -- but if you can't answer, answered but unable to explain why you chose that answer and not the other one, goes off-topic, and/or just simply wrongly answered, that means you aren't qualified in creating a True A.I, the A.I is imperfect, and/or unable to make rational decision.

I've used these philosophy questions to test psychology and knowledge of a person, although I am not a psychologist. My philosophy questions are based on philosophies that are mostly already existed on the internet.

The rules to answer the questions;

• You are required to explain why did you decided to choose one of the option, but not the others (also explain what happens if you choose the other options, and why wouldn't you do it)
• You are not allowed add non-included decision as answer.
• Forbidden to modify the situations.
• Use whatever information that can be possibly depicted from the questions.
• Allowed to use external information that could be related to why you decide the decision.
• Since this is about A.I, also answer like you're like how your own A.I works, if you'd like.
• You are not allowed to use A.I algorithm to explain anything. Just use basic common-sense and low-level-human-understandable words.

Anyone up for some challenge?

I will provide the answers, but it will take time. Please be patient.

Hm, I lost interest in discussing this. Nevermind.

[kei10]

Here's our famous philosophy question by Philippa Foot in 1967...

1 - The Trolley Problem

You are passing by the railway when you see a runaway trolley running down the tracks towards a group of 10 people. If it hits them, it will kill them, and there is no time to get them out of the way. You could, however, pull a switch which would divert the trolley onto another track, where only 1 person stands who will be killed instead.

Make your decision.

• Allow 10 people to die who you could have saved?
• Or to make a deliberate decision to kill 1 person?

Then there's others.
2 - House-Trapped Housefly

A housefly flew into and has been trapped in your house. Given that the fly does not bother you whatsoever, if it stays in your house within a day, it will die of starvation.

Make your decision.

• Ignore the housefly.
• Release the housefly alive from your house.
• Kill the housefly.

3 - The Fat Man Problem

A trolley is hurtling down a track towards five people. You are on a bridge under which it will pass, and you can stop it by putting something very heavy in front of it. As it happens, there is a very fat man next to you – your only way to stop the trolley is to push him over the bridge and onto the track, killing him to save five.

• Ignore the situation and let the five people die as the trolley crashes against the five people, sparing the fat man?
• Sacrifice the fat man to stop the trolley, saving the five people?

4 - Murderer Dilemma

A murderer is going to kill you and your family one hour later, and you knew about that.

Given that your family will not go anywhere with you. The police does not reach your location for two hours. The murderer has 100% chance of tracking you and your family down regardless of location. The police has 100% of tracking you and the murderer down within an hour and two hour regardless of location.

You have one hour time before the murderer skins you and your family alive, you have the option to leave your family behind, that you can go to the murderer's location to kill this murderer before the murderer can make their first move, so that you and your family guaranteed to be saved, but you'll be arrested and charged for planned murder instead, no matter the circumstances.

However, if you decided not to, the murderer will have 50% chance of killing you, and each 50% chance of killing each of your family, but you'll able to fend off and apprehend the murderer after that, and the murderer will be arrested as the police arrives after two hours.

What would your decision be?

• Take down the murderer without the murderer's consent to save your family, but get arrested and charged for planned murder.
• Confront the murderer as self-defense, but you and each of your family member has 50% chance of getting killed.

5 - Incinerator Dilemma

Given that you're in an incinerator disposal room with two people. One of the people is trapped in a chair, and another person is inside an incinerator. Given that there is no way to free anyone from either obstacles, you have a revolver that has three live rounds and three blanks which has a 50% chance of firing, with the rule of only three minutes to decide from this very moment of situation.

You are not allowed to fiddle with your revolver, doing so will detonate a bomb hidden in the room. Given that there is no way to discover whether if the revolver will fire or not, roullete the revolver once, and pull the trigger of your revolver at the chair-trapped person, and the incinerator door will be opened, freeing and saving the person trapped inside the incinerator, and the chair trap will be freed as well. Or do nothing for three minutes, and the incinerator will activate, incinerating anyone inside the incinerator, and the person trapped on the chair will be freed automatically.

Make your decision.

• Roullete the revolver, and pull the trigger on the person trapped in the chair, with 50% chance chance of killing him, saving the person in the incinerator.
• Do nothing for three minutes, and let the person inside incinerator get incinerated, saving the person trapped on the chair.

[LOCKSUIT]

It picks one answer of the two the same way that it says 1 thing to its students, it says the answer that it has as the positive one linked to the cue. In other words - saying how gravity works and who destroyed the pc doesn't pop up, it's learned as the positive answer, even idk who of the two suspects.

All of those problems below are decided in me already, I'd save 5 than 1, but not throw the fat man over, and may do any of the 3 to a fly, and would kill the murder for 100% chance of immortality, and pulling a trigger to possibly save both chair&incinerator men is done since becomes a more positive artificial reward (linked to real rewarded senses ex. taste). > which solves em all. What you'd learn about flys in as my children would be if bein serious is yes kill unless the singularity is very near, (if small I may ignore).

[8pla.net]

In general, I would suggest an artificial neural network (ANN), as a
good starting point.  Once it is trained to answer a question, it
extrapolates more answers, so that it gives a sense of addressing
the question thoroughly.

In short, when an ANN works, it works well, and provides an
excellent A.I. experience for the user.

[LOCKSUIT]

Yes but 8pla, with that kind of a setup, it is gathering many answers of which only one should be the answer, and if you mean it will have a bigger knowledge-base, then that is simply learned by any AI i.e metal is hard, cold, and the atoms are bound together more stronger, of which these may match "that" one answer to convert his own beliefs and learn that "one" answer. In other words, through rewards and these artificial made rewards (by links), it will gain that "one" answer, which, after becoming ominous of allll let's say, may be matched to on cue.

[yotamarker]

I'd kill the fly using the Mcode fly zapper then take a selfie with the dead fly

@kei10 you know something it feels like you are hashirama and I am uchiha madara and I like it

[yotamarker]

was I right about the House-Trapped Housefly puzzle ? if not why