You're behaviour is steadily improving or you wouldn't still have access. Just keep working on developing empathy for your prospective readers and you'll be able to avoid posting anything creepy. 
Theory of Mind is something a budding behaviorist would be interested in. It's described adequately in this tutorial at W3Schools.com, where I learned XHTML and CSS, as a part of AI and considered to be Cognitive Science. Where I find my place among Bot programming Brainiacs, my area of expertise of benefit to yours and things come together.
As previous post point out you are as sorely lacking in that area as I am in yours, and when I see you wandering in the weeds provide input to your benefit.
I don't see a problem in the Title or perceive what fetish it indicates. I have Demonca apologize and she will forgive people if they apologize for something they've done, but she is using manipulation to work the users feelings because I taught her how to do it. It is seen as an essential part in the future of bots:
Theory of Mind
Theory of Mind is a term from psychology about an individual's capacity for empathy and understanding of others.
This is an awareness of others being like yourself, with individual needs and intentions.
One of the abilities language users have, is to communicate about things that are not concrete, like needs, ideas, or concepts.
Simon Baron-Cohen, British psychologist and professor at the University of Cambridge, argues (1999) that "Theory of Mind" must have preceded languages, based on knowledge about early human activities:
Teaching
Building Shared Goals
Building Shared Plans
Intentional Communication
Intentional Sharing of Topic
Intentional Sharing of Focus
Intentional Persuasion
Intentional Pretending
Intentional Deception
Self-Awareness
In psychology, "Theory of Mind" means that people have thoughts, feelings and emotions that affect their behavior.
Future AI systems must learn to understand that everyone (both people and AI objects) have thoughts and feelings.
Future AI systems must know how to adjust their behavior to be able to walk among us.
The last step, before AI can be human, is machine consciousness.
We can not construct this software before we know much more about the human brain, memory, and intelligence.
https://www.w3schools.com/ai/ai_mind.asp
Isn't that what I've been telling you all along? Mostly after I've given a informative nudge in the right direction. and I said she was the future of AI. But that got some unexpected reactions from certain people. Now I must, at risk of it seeming like something abnormal I enjoy doing to extremes, or fetish, correctly defined as:
1. an object regarded with awe as being the embodiment or habitation of a potent spirit or as having magical potency.
2. any object, idea, etc., eliciting unquestioning reverence, respect, or devotion: to make a fetish of high grades.
3. Psychology. any object or nongenital part of the body that causes a habitual erotic response or fixation.
When teaching a new skill or addressing a behavior it is imperative that your be consistent in your methods to be successful in your efforts. Not a philosophy of "do as I say, not as I do". That does not model the appropriate behavior expected from from the trainee and has little hope of success in modifying the target behavior.
Can you see where I'm going with this? No, you do not or you would be aware of it as a Behaviorist. I made the observation in your behavior being inconsistent as documented right away.
https://aidreams.co.uk/forum/ai-news/a-robot-s-self-portrait-has-sold-for-almost-$700-000-as-an-nft/msg66583/#msg66583
Being forum Admin is not an easy job,.I've had my own forums and know from experience. I also know about freedom of speech and when it does and does not apply. It does not apply to a forum.
Your previous statement should apply across the board to everyone, from new member, Moderator to Administrator and you, as Admin, should be the of Model of Appropriate behavior:
Nobody has a right to be rude, discourteous, or offensive, not even accidentally.
That is not found to be consistent behavior in you as documented:
https://aidreams.co.uk/forum/ai-news/a-robot-s-self-portrait-has-sold-for-almost-$700-000-as-an-nft/msg66583/#msg66583
That my observation as a Behaviorist. Though you may find it rude, discourteous, or offensive and I expect the same reaction to stimulus as last time. The consequence of said behavior is on you and next in the flow Stimulus - Response - Consequence. Will you see the problem in yourself, or in me and think it easier to get rid of me than work on yourself?
I am not the least concerned and would say t again either way, because you don't see it. I won't pretend I don't out of fear of retribution for stating the facts as documented. Because you cannot be offended by the facts or it falls on you regardless and facts are facts. I have no fear of, or in stating the facts and any consequences that of your own behavior, not mine.
