Primary Cortex is each sensory input's first major stop:
The lateral Geniculate Nucleus (LGN) is the first major stop for ocular data, after being pre-processed by the retina.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThalamusQuote from link: For the visual system, for example, inputs from the retina are sent to thelateral geniculate nucleus of the thalamus, which in turn projects to the visual cortex in the occipital lobe.
Then they go to the Association Cortex:
After leaving the LGN the ocular data stream does move to the V1 cortex, but then splits to many other cortex areas, ‘some’ axons terminate in the area collectively known as the visual associative area. (V2,V3 & V4, etc)
Quote from link: “However, there is still much debate about the degree of specialization within these two pathways, since they are in fact heavily interconnected.â€
Then all sensory and motor go to the same place being the HOAC:
Higher-order integrative cortical areas are thought to exist all over the cortex, combining/ integrating many different neural data streams.
The Dorsal Stream takes them their, wiki says the Dorsal Stream leads to actions after you see a cue (foundation of machine learning):
Quote from link: The dorsal stream, commonly referred to as the "where" stream, is involved in spatial attention (covert and overt), and communicates with regions that control eye movements and hand movements. More recently, this area has been called the "how" stream to emphasize its role in guiding behaviors to spatial locations.
Spatial attention has nothing to do with…
actions after you see a cue (foundation of machine learning):
Then the Motors's OWN Primary and Association Cortices work backwards on the left (frontal lobe) of the brain and do actions on external cues (tested actions are linked to ex. rewarded senses>training):
How did you get this description from that link?
I appreciate the fact that you have tried to provide links, but even if a link was written by a PHD it’s still one person’s interpretation or theory.
Even if you had an accurate diagram and links that corresponded to your theory, even if you had a good argument… it would still be a theory.
You cannot prove a theory or convince anyone with words. This is why so many huge organisations are building models and investing money... to provide a ‘working‘ proof.
You are trying to pass off your description as the
actual way the brain works. All you have is a theory; the sooner you understand that the easier your journey will be.
Look at this diagram of internal cortex connections.
I could make up any path and state it was correct.
My point being that leading anyone through how you think the brain works... doesn't make it so.
Visual input goes to the Primary Cortex 1st, see it in our picture? 100% correct.
Every type of signal or data transport has a format. How do you imagine this ocular data is travelling down the optic nerve to the LGN?
How is that format pattern matched?
You're skipping over HUGE problems that you need to solve and explain.
All you have is a brief outline/ idea of how you
think the brain works, and if you weren't insisting that your theory explains the
actual workings of the brain... this would go much smoother.
