A.I. Programming of the Future

  • 2 Replies
  • 1222 Views
*

Ultron

  • Trusty Member
  • *******
  • Starship Trooper
  • *
  • 471
  • There are no strings on me.
A.I. Programming of the Future
« on: March 08, 2015, 08:49:17 pm »
https://medium.com/@matt__way/the-future-of-ai-looks-nothing-like-software-development-as-you-know-it-f7d6358c864b


Must say I completely agree with the opening of the article. A.I. 'programming' (as in, true/strong/general intelligence) will be a lot more like parenting instead of the classical algorithmic programming we are familiar with today.
Software and Hardware developer, and everything in between.

*

Art

  • At the end of the game, the King and Pawn go into the same box.
  • Moderator
  • **********************
  • Colossus
  • *
  • 5865
Re: A.I. Programming of the Future
« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2015, 01:09:05 am »
Made me chuckle a bit as I recall the now rather infamous quote from Bill Gates who, many, many years ago, in the early days of DOS and computing, made quite a comment about computer memory.
############## From a Wikiquote article ################

I've heard someone saying that this sentence was actually said by an IBM engineer. Unfortunately I don't remember where I read it and neither the engineer's name. Do you know something about this?

"640K ought to be enough for anybody" *was* *definitely* said by Bill Gates. He said it at an early microcomputer trade show in Seattle in mid 1981. It is the Microsoft PR machine that has tried over the years to rewrite history and pretend that Gates never made this asinine comment.

#############################################

Yeah...the moore's law thing kicked in a bit early and just keeps on ticking....
In the world of AI, it's the thought that counts!

*

Ultron

  • Trusty Member
  • *******
  • Starship Trooper
  • *
  • 471
  • There are no strings on me.
Re: A.I. Programming of the Future
« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2015, 02:32:14 pm »
Just proves that all our estimations regarding A.I. at the moment are bogus. For example, for a while I was thinking that (according to some older versions of my AGI concepts) an averagely priced computer with balanced specifications would be enough to run a real intelligence. At the moment I did not see the point in using supercomputer clusters or deep learning networks, however after several experiments and additional theories (and a revised concept of true AGI) it seems that we will in fact, need a supercomputer capable of many simultaneous processes and quick communication between them (may shared memory - threads), so probably a lot of processor cores or maybe a new processor/motherboard architecture.

So, I guess the only way is to keep experimenting and focusing on the problems in our theory / concept / program instead of the advantages it has. Problems in terms of the lack of human 'processing' and thinking capabilities.
Software and Hardware developer, and everything in between.

 


LLaMA2 Meta's chatbot released
by spydaz (AI News )
August 24, 2024, 02:58:36 pm
ollama and llama3
by spydaz (AI News )
August 24, 2024, 02:55:13 pm
AI controlled F-16, for real!
by frankinstien (AI News )
June 15, 2024, 05:40:28 am
Open AI GPT-4o - audio, vision, text combined reasoning
by MikeB (AI News )
May 14, 2024, 05:46:48 am
OpenAI Speech-to-Speech Reasoning Demo
by MikeB (AI News )
March 31, 2024, 01:00:53 pm
Say good-bye to GPUs...
by MikeB (AI News )
March 23, 2024, 09:23:52 am
Google Bard report
by ivan.moony (AI News )
February 14, 2024, 04:42:23 pm
Elon Musk's xAI Grok Chatbot
by MikeB (AI News )
December 11, 2023, 06:26:33 am

Users Online

408 Guests, 0 Users

Most Online Today: 489. Most Online Ever: 2369 (November 21, 2020, 04:08:13 pm)

Articles