Hi,
I wanted to review my inputs in our dream-forum, AiDreams my home on the net. Well, there's less than I expected. I counted only topics I started, and only the ones I still consider interesting today. Here is a list, in random order.
https://aidreams.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=9770.msg38159#msg38159DSX, a syntax to explicitly indicate the structure of natural language. I still think it can be a basis for a chatbot that knows what it's talking about.
https://aidreams.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=9021.msg36202#msg36202Logic with glob pattern. Pointless but funny.
https://aidreams.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=10241.msg39485#msg39485Big picture, around the idea of a simulation of the world that would be the center of an AI.
https://aidreams.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=12005.msg45881#msg45881A massively redundant network topology description language. This one is important, even though it doesn't fit my usual approach, which is rather symbolic.
https://aidreams.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=12723.msg49997#msg49997The never-ending list of what's in a mind...
https://aidreams.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=12744.msg50120#msg50120The idea of an "inner dashboard", representing the subjective experience of a program. This is important.
https://aidreams.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=13303.msg54329#msg54329What body for a thinkbot? An XML body in an XML world.
https://aidreams.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=13275.msg54211#msg54211Ontologies don't need to be set in stone.
https://aidreams.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=13207.msg53675#msg53675The consnet, at the heart of it all. The best of the best.
https://aidreams.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=13330.msg54470#msg54470My nicest syntax, equivalent to s-exp, but reads better in my opinion. Unifies code blocks and function parameters syntaxes.
https://aidreams.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=14094.msg59047#msg59047What thought next? => Association / Utility / Plan / Surprise.
https://aidreams.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=13358.msg54596#msg54596Thought stacks, a central structure.
That's it.
