Finally, it would be a web site that would unite all the scientific fields and open a possibility to upload different science theory fields that could mutually interact to derive a new, yet undiscovered knowledge.
So a unified theory of everything?
Heterarchies are good for meaning understanding, translation.
Hierarchies are meant for entailment, sequences.
If you have many sentences you want to 'connect', i don't think storing them in a hierarchy is as useful. There's many connections lost. Ask yourself this, do they really build together? A common parent can connect them but you miss out on billion of connections that aren't possible to 'separate' individually in a hierarchy, without a heterarchy ontop it. You can use both.
You can inject dyes onto nodes to see the spread activations in red glow...etc!
Finally, it would be a web site that would unite all the scientific fields and open a possibility to upload different science theory fields that could mutually interact to derive a new, yet undiscovered knowledge.
I don't understand what you're trying to do. How do you unite all scientific fields? The only ways I can think to do this are:
(1) try to combine ideas across fields - interesting, but I don't see how this could be done
(2 ) make very general statements, especially heuristics - interesting, but mostly a philosophical result
(3) come up with the equivalent of Maxwell's equations for each field and subfield - very likely to fail
(4) use the same terminology where applicable - doesn't sound very productive
Similar projects that *would* be useful in my opinion are:
(1) create a compendium of problemsolving heuristics - like Polya's book, except much more extensive, very valuable
(2) find a way to logically organize all the different topics - interesting and useful
(3) create a science news-like page that tells the state of the art in each field - extremely useful
Mine is better than hypergraphs though....that viz only shows that a node can link 100% in strength to as many other nodes as it desires, but mine allows adjustable weights between every node to every other node.
Ivan, I remember you said you knew so much you knew you knew very little. Can you write a wall of nonstop text explaining 80 different things / related you've learnt? I'm interested in what you know :D Like this:
"People are self-focused. Like stars. They can release back all their heat not just take. The brain learns patterns yet all is patterns. Sodium makes chains like the brain does. Brains are like cells, society is like brains. Evolution of data is.... "
Because my theory says things unite, not expand. You said you knew so much that you knew it was impossible to ever close it into a unity...
But about a train of my thoughts... I think I'll pass... The most of my thoughts are useless anyway.
</Bold ... any text goes here ... />
</Italic ... any text goes here ... />
</</Font </Face Sans/> </Size 12pt/>/>
... any text goes here ...
/>
tag subtag units
---------------------------
NewLine / /
LeftBrace / /
RightBrace / /
Image / /
Font Size pt, px
Font Face /
Bold / /
Italic / /
So... if I want to render the characters </hi just to be awkward...
:)
</OpenTag/> hi
"</hi"
Hi Ivan :)
Do you plan to offer the possibility to create DSL (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-specific_language)s, like Racket (https://racket-lang.org/) for example? Or is "having a unified language" a distinctive feature of the project?
Finally, it would be a web site that would unite all the scientific fields and open a possibility to upload different science theory fields that could mutually interact to derive a new, yet undiscovered knowledge.Scientists from different fields would desire a platform that adapts to their particular needs, in terms of UI, language, and tools. Bridges with existing tools, as well as interviews with potential users, could be considered useful in the design process. You know, at least picking a few people who might be future users, and have a few mails with them, about how they see it... what tools they already use, what E-Teoria could bring on the table, ...etc. Talking with people is an interesting part of the process.
That's a good thing, because you said:QuoteFinally, it would be a web site that would unite all the scientific fields and open a possibility to upload different science theory fields that could mutually interact to derive a new, yet undiscovered knowledge.Scientists from different fields would desire a platform that adapts to their particular needs, in terms of UI, language, and tools. Bridges with existing tools, as well as interviews with potential users, could be considered useful in the design process. You know, at least picking a few people who might be future users, and have a few mails with them, about how they see it... what tools they already use, what E-Teoria could bring on the table, ...etc. Talking with people is an interesting part of the process.