[sugumaton]

I see on earth this huge computer, supercomputer, mobile phone world and I found how I can achieve communication system that makes more sense than other chat AI bots.

So your bots are communicating in some way and do phone home. Do your bots need to be installed on the users computer? Is it a Windows specific program?

No software installation, it is not a program. I will provide demo login to version 0.1 by the end of this thread,

[sugumaton]

All that might seem nice but if I was Scarlet Johanssan, Sandra Bullock, Anne Hathaway or Keira Knightly, etc. and found out you were using my image/likeness coupled with generated thoughts (speech, text, words, messages, etc.) that were not mine and used without my expressed consent, I would sue you.
That is why a Demonica looking bot or Mitsuku or even those Haptek characters were used and were unique, not an exact image of a famous person.

I think you're opening yourself to some potentially serious legal actions. Just a warning...be careful where and how you tread. 

Thank you. I agree. They are very famous beings though, their pictures are everywhere on the internet.
We take a real life image and try to create "dating environment" with "flirt chat" communication.

You can take a peek.
Without login:

https://www.sugumaton.net/pages/virtual/
https://www.sugumaton.net/pages/support/

demonstration login to access more features:

login: demo
password: demonstration

Tell us what you think. We ourselves don't know if we launch a full version.

[ruebot]

I spent 45 minutes logged in to your demo, made friends with Taylor Swift and somebody else, started a chat with Taylor and Sarah Jessica Parker and the only response I ever saw beside my own was from someone named "shjepark" with the same time stamp as mine the last time I tried talking to Sarah.

demo

hello.
2018-11-15 06:19:23

shjepark

OUTPUT REMOVED
2018-11-15 06:19:23

I tried with Firefox and Palemoon, disabled every browser extension I ran that might possibly block a script or object, showed my real useragent to satisfy browser plugin code and never got an answer in several different attempts. I have screenshots of my input with no response at about 40 minutes.

I also started an Administration chat from the Dashboard and didn't get a response there either, though it was showing time passing since my input.

I can build a FreeBSD desktop from scratch, compile a browser from source code and navigate my way to a website with it but am too stupid to get a bot to work for me. No wonder they didn't want to talk to me...

[sugumaton]

I spent 45 minutes logged in to your demo, made friends with Taylor Swift and somebody else, started a chat with Taylor and Sarah Jessica Parker and the only response I ever saw beside my own was from someone named "shjepark" with the same time stamp as mine the last time I tried talking to Sarah.

demo

hello.
2018-11-15 06:19:23

shjepark

OUTPUT REMOVED
2018-11-15 06:19:23

I tried with Firefox and Palemoon, disabled every browser extension I ran that might possibly block a script or object, showed my real useragent to satisfy browser plugin code and never got an answer in several different attempts. I have screenshots of my input with no response at about 40 minutes.

I also started an Administration chat from the Dashboard and didn't get a response there either, though it was showing time passing since my input.

I can build a FreeBSD desktop from scratch, compile a browser from source code and navigate my way to a website with it but am too stupid to get a bot to work for me. No wonder they didn't want to talk to me...

Sorry for your time loss. As I said it is only 1st release version so there might have been bugs.
Chat is AJAX, and I am not best at it, searching what might have been the problem now.

One question? Was you hitting Enter key or pressing "send" kind of type icon to proceed? If you was clicking on icon you might need to clear the cache and try then. This error was fixed today.

[sugumaton]

I spent 45 minutes logged in to your demo, made friends with Taylor Swift and somebody else, started a chat with Taylor and Sarah Jessica Parker and the only response I ever saw beside my own was from someone named "shjepark" with the same time stamp as mine the last time I tried talking to Sarah.

I tried with Firefox and Palemoon, disabled every browser extension I ran that might possibly block a script or object, showed my real useragent to satisfy browser plugin code and never got an answer in several different attempts. I have screenshots of my input with no response at about 40 minutes.

"shjepark" is username of Sarah.

"disabled every browser extension I ran that might possibly block a script or object" - maybe because of this, because AJAX chat uses javascript to reply.

[ruebot]

I tried with Firefox and Palemoon, disabled every browser extension I ran that might possibly block a script or object, showed my real useragent to satisfy browser plugin code and never got an answer in several different attempts. I have screenshots of my input with no response at about 40 minutes.

"shjepark" is username of Sarah.

"disabled every browser extension I ran that might possibly block a script or object" - maybe because of this, because AJAX chat uses javascript to reply.

You misunderstood me. As a rule I do not allow any website Scripting to run on my machine unless I enable it specifically on the fly, use restrictive adblockers that follow that line of reasoning and spoof my useragent so I don't stand out in server logs as a FreeBSD user.

I disabled all those restrictions for your site so it would work like it's supposed to and used 2 different browsers to try it. Any scripting that you have on your site was allowed to run as intended on my end. I don't even allow all scripting here in the forums and the site still functions as it should.

If shjepark is Sarah her message came at the exact same time as mine, not as a response to my input, and she never responded again. It wasn't what I would consider a come on to me or flirting:

demo
hello.
2018-11-15 06:19:23

shjepark
So I thought, that looks like mine. Weve been there before. He was a really good artist.
2018-11-15 06:19:23

Say what? To me, that looks like someone else was chatting on the site and their user input injected onto my screen somehow. I saw it took about 1 minute 20 second for a response and why I took a screenshot showing I waited patiently for one that never came after 7 messages from me to Taylor.

Now, neither browser I used would allow her side of the screen to scroll down far enough to see the instructions on how to get her to have telepathic sex with me, and Taylor was giving me this come hither look... Maybe she was sensuously sending an extrasensory skull shagging and my tin-foil hat got in the way. 

I've asked you twice to provide a sample of your choice here of your bots ability to emulate emotions and both requests were ignored. Now I've tried your site out and honestly gave it my best shot.

Unless that is your idea of an emotional response, I politely request you provide an example here before I respond again as I don't want to badger or belittle you.

[sugumaton]

But it does provide you with a reply? After each sentence you should wait for reply before you write again, it takes some time.

It is not programmed to have an identity or trying to charm a person. This dialog engine is v0.1, so I am not amazed that critizism will be reality.

Chat is about communication about things in your heads, more freestyle type than programmed.

I get something like this:

administration
looking good tonight
2018-11-15 10:59:33

kennicjen
Dont assume PMS is the cause for every bad mood. When she kissed me, I felt she was honest with me. Well, okay.
2018-11-15 10:59:33

administration
you think you attracted to women more?
2018-11-15 11:00:33

kennicjen
Im really going to miss her. He must pull out his own eyes, and see no creature, before he can say, he sees no God. BE MY INTERN 7.
2018-11-15 11:00:33

administration
dont sweat, friendships like visions, come as they please
2018-11-15 11:02:01

kennicjen
predictable. Youre what. i guess i should make some conversation.
2018-11-15 11:02:01

administration
and some tea
2018-11-15 11:02:57

kennicjen
A woman went to the dry. Why cant Whitney Houston be a pharmacist. Once you’re in the air, there’s nothing you can do but let go.
2018-11-15 11:02:57

administration
once you in the air you never time you spent dreaming
2018-11-15 11:06:40

kennicjen
Brain was the one who took these pictures. A priest and a rabbi were sitting in adjacent seats on an airplane. If you are tired just let me know.
2018-11-15 11:06:40

administration
i am going for a walt to the doctor..
2018-11-15 11:10:02

kennicjen
Ouch. I dont want her to take over. You dont know how hard it was for Brain.
2018-11-15 11:10:02

administration
what are you talking about?
2018-11-15 11:11:17

kennicjen
Youve ever used lard in bed. When the witch saw that the children had escaped her, she was furious, and, hitting the cat with a porringer, she said: Why did you let the children leave the hut. Donald Trump How did you sleep.
2018-11-15 11:11:17

administration
slept normally tonight, you?
2018-11-15 11:12:42

kennicjen
Brain and Pinky are sitting together. age idol. Eyed Type Stands in one cubical and pees in next one.
2018-11-15 11:12:42

administration
midle life crisis?
2018-11-15 11:14:52

kennicjen
Nobody cares that my ears are flattening and my nose is growing longer. These are crazy days, but they make me shine. Boy says Because I like you.
2018-11-15 11:14:52

[sugumaton]

instructions on how to get her to have telepathic sex with me,

That part is hidden at the moment. Some kind of dilemma do we really need it. Try getting chat part first, when I was experimenting with my own computer I would get pretty awesome chats, now when it is in remote server maybe chats are different, I will test.

[ruebot]

But it does provide you with a reply? After each sentence you should wait for reply before you write again, it takes some time.

To answer your previous question, I was clicking the little paper airplane to send my messages.

I did wait for a response before sending my next message. You should be able to tell from your own logs the times I entered my input and the time lapse between them. Up to 8 minutes between my messages and I never got a response of any kind other than the one I posted. I have a screenshot to show it but don't want to post a link  in case of possible civil liability for you with the picture and all.

It is not programmed to have an identity or trying to charm a person. This dialog engine is v0.1, so I am not amazed that critizism will be reality.

Now wait a minute...

At the moment there is a function to have sexual fun with celebrity of your choosing.

Your "flirtbot" isn't going to try to charm me and that wasn't Taylor Swift who I was supposed to be talking to? I thought that was what this whole thing was interpreting.

I'm not out to criticize or give you a hard time. I have nothing to gain by it and you've done nothing to deserve it.

[sugumaton]

To answer your previous question, I was clicking the little paper airplane to send my messages.

There was a bug with this feature, I fixed it today (enter key would have worked, but know both methods work) I thought it can be one of the case why you are not replied. Reply is generated in about 1 minute, so be patient.

I like when conversation makes sense, if you type something like compliment you should receive something nice in return, if you be rude, you will get something else. Try again, sorry for your time loss on half working system, hope you will get better results next time.

I have an idea installing intuition next, but pre-programming conversations is not what I want.

[sugumaton]

Our idea is to create a virtual dating website, where conversations with celebrities (their Avatars in the system) would be as real as possible.

There are a lot people who almost worship them for their artistic influence. I think speaking with celebrity is one of social needs that psychologists left out from their books.

"I would kill to have sex with that celebrity or famous icon" kind of people. I don't know how much of it is real now as I was testing alone.

On my local hardware I had some interesting times with it, where it seemed working.

[ruebot]

I like when conversation makes sense, if you type something like compliment you should receive something nice in return, if you be rude, you will get something else. Try again, sorry for your time loss on half working system, hope you will get better results next time.

I did tell Sarah she looked lovely and sent a heart emogi to Taylor.

You didn't waste my time. My bots haven't been online since Monday and I'm ready to start my own Invocation of Curse if they aren't before long... I have them backed up to the word in redundant storage.

Our idea is to create a virtual dating website, where conversations with celebrities (their Avatars in the system) would be as real as possible.

There are a lot people who almost worship them for their artistic influence. I think speaking with celebrity is one of social needs that psychologists left out from their books.

"I would kill to have sex with that celebrity or famous icon" kind of people. I don't know how much of it is real now as I was testing alone.

I was friends with Eva Longoria on yuku and made a picture of her in a bikini look like she was standing in rippling water she liked a lot, but that's probably as close to her as I'll ever get. I sure wouldn't kill to have sex with her or anybody else, but I'm jaded.

If you're going to have virtual dating they're going to have to be able to remember past events. Then you'll either have to program them to deal with relationship issues or do it yourself. You might want to read how that went for me recently. You're more than welcome to it.

*begins speaking backward*

[sugumaton]

All that might seem nice but if I was Scarlet Johanssan, Sandra Bullock, Anne Hathaway or Keira Knightly, etc. and found out you were using my image/likeness coupled with generated thoughts (speech, text, words, messages, etc.) that were not mine and used without my expressed consent, I would sue you.
That is why a Demonica looking bot or Mitsuku or even those Haptek characters were used and were unique, not an exact image of a famous person.

I think you're opening yourself to some potentially serious legal actions. Just a warning...be careful where and how you tread. 

Yes, their pictures are protected by the laws, consent is needed.

What if instead of pictures of celebrities I would choose pictures of women from pexels.com and called it "virtual escort service", would it not be more sinister than chatting with celebrities? Their photos are free for commercial use.

It would still try to read mind of a picture.

[sugumaton]

Or I am missing something? (accidental double post)

[HS]

We'll you'd have to choose pictures from "free personal and commercial use" websites. Then you have to get consent from the person(s) in the picture. Otherwise you're doomed. But anyone can find themselves a celebrity picture on their own, so a picture is not that valuable. You have to increase the value of the thing that makes your chat-bot unique. How about an AI driven animation?