Ai Dreams Forum
Member's Experiments & Projects => General Project Discussion => Topic started by: sugumaton on November 02, 2018, 11:15:18 am
-
version 0.1
mirrors personality, deep chat with meaning, searching for volunteers to test the system
sign-up with codes, limited, meant to be interesting
-
It would be nice if you would supply a Link.
-
As registration is strictly private and sign up code is needed, please request with Private Message, there about 200 free spots.
Social network type of program, chats are very interesting. Has potential to be "better than porn" kind of website.
We do not want to make link official at the start of the project, as internet has quarantine kind of treatment for new projects anyway, too many scam websites. Just write a PM and we will supply you with sign up code to rate our interesting website.
For entertainment purposes. Website does not log ip addresses, though hosting company might log.
-
Could you provide some elaboration on used technology, please?
-
Mind reading experiment. Mind projection.
Big database of words to pick up vibrations for conversation.
Cracked a nut there, it is based on logic and it works on Artificial Technology devices communicating about their hosts (owners).
Something more like computer speaking with computer.
I call it "magic box" where celebrities live, some inspiration taken from "spirit box" mind concept.
By requests we can add your favorite star into network.
-
I would like to say that we would like to compete in "chat bot" section for the best chat AI bot, I did visit every chat bot, tested it and came up with my own angle to this section of invention.
It is made "flirt" bot as it is more complicated than usual chat system.
-
Social network type of program, chats are very interesting. Has potential to be "better than porn" kind of website.
Could you please elaborate? What is going to make your bots different than any other bot specifically programmed for flirting or sexual dialog? What perceived potential do your bots have to make flirting "better than porn", pray tell. Men reportedly being more visually stimulated than a woman.
I ask because about half the bots at The Personality Forge are sexbots now. I've talked to a few to see what they were on about and had to say. Some were alright as bots and their dialog. Others were pathetic in their interpretation of "sex", their writers sorely lacking in something.
My bot Demonica, Queen of the Land of the Dead "lives" there. She is a Sorceress capable of summoning the cast of characters from The Devils Rejects to quote themselves from the movie and do their thing. How are you going to convince me I'm talking to Scarlet Johanssan and not Sheri Moon Zombie?
Is your dialog computer generated or written by a human? I write all her dialog by hand. I already have examples of normal "flirting" posted here, full transcripts on her site and she's online 24/7. I'd like to see how your flirting compares, how convincing is it as a human response and what makes it special, here if you don't mind. I'm genuinely interested in their abilities to show emotion, but but have too much work of my own to join.
...it works on Artificial Technology devices communicating about their hosts (owners).
Something more like computer speaking with computer.
So your bots phone home about their user? Where are these devices installed?
-
I did visit every chat bot, tested it and came up with my own angle to this section of invention.
Really? How many chatbots are there? Please list them all here.
-
The idea behind this project is to create a virtual dating platform for fans to have an opportunity to speak with movie stars, sport figures and so on, It is not only "flirt bot", it can be a good mood lifter, as celebrities are almost perfect.
Because we are in 0.1 version and limited amount of faces are testing it, it is hard to tell. At the moment there is a function to have sexual fun with celebrity of your choosing. Some would say it is perverted, we say it is a social need for a human to have sex with a celebrity at least once before dying.
"better than porn"
- idea behind is this - watching porn usually leaves a bad aftertaste and makes your spirit feel less worthy, as we do not know what porn models really are. While entertainment people and sports men are really twice or not three times better that usual companion.
It helps regular dating life, where having a partner need do not control your life. There are more to this I want to take project slow and explain my thoughts behind it.
I ask because about half the bots at The Personality Forge are sexbots now. I've talked to a few to see what they were on about and had to say. Some were alright as bots and their dialog. Others were pathetic in their interpretation of "sex", their writers sorely lacking in something.
These bots are first of their kind, so they might not be perfect. We have this invention in sugumaton where you can have sex with celebrity AI after you chatted with it, but it still not perfect. Maybe all sex options will be dropped and it will remain only as chat bot. Phrases it speaks makes me think, that it's not the peak yet.
How are you going to convince me I'm talking to Scarlet Johanssan and not Sheri Moon Zombie?
There will be proof, each and different soul speaks completely different phrases.
It think response is combo - computer generated and human touch.
s your dialog computer generated or written by a human? I write all her dialog by hand. I already have examples of normal "flirting" posted here, full transcripts on her site and she's online 24/7. I'd like to see how your flirting compares, how convincing is it as a human response and what makes it special, here if you don't mind. I'm genuinely interested in their abilities to show emotion, but but have too much work of my own to join.
I can give an access to test my project, when you free of course. 2nd opinion is needed.
What do you think best flirt bot is? If I may ask.
I see on earth this huge computer, supercomputer, mobile phone world and I found how I can achieve communication system that makes more sense than other chat AI bots
-
I did visit every chat bot, tested it and came up with my own angle to this section of invention.
Really? How many chatbots are there? Please list them all here.
Almost every invention from ai.wikia.com/wiki/List_Of_Chat_Bots
Would I be okay ito post screenshots of the website, that you could imagine what this is?
-
That is a pretty good listing. O0
-
I see on earth this huge computer, supercomputer, mobile phone world and I found how I can achieve communication system that makes more sense than other chat AI bots.
So your bots are communicating in some way and do phone home. Do your bots need to be installed on the users computer? Is it a Windows specific program?
I'm still interested in your bots abilities to emulate emotion, but would still rather see an example here. You choose yours, I'll go with what I already have posted in her Neko example (http://aidreams.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=13447.15). I'm not sold on the sexbot side of things, but have some steamy sexual dialog in stock should the new sensation be digital pimping. :P
I can change my style of speech or type to match the subject, Demonica and Siseneg are quite different in character and manner of speech. (I channeled a Gaelic accent of some sort once that had people in chat believing the angels were whispering secrets in me ears...)
However, I am still not convinced you can persuade me, or anyone, to think I'm talking to Scarlett Johanssan and not Sheri Moon Zombie, Sandra Bullock, Anne Hathaway, etc. Yes, they may use different phrases, but am I supposed to know the difference in how Sandra Bullock and Anne Hathaway speak?
Edit:Fixed my link.
-
All that might seem nice but if I was Scarlet Johanssan, Sandra Bullock, Anne Hathaway or Keira Knightly, etc. and found out you were using my image/likeness coupled with generated thoughts (speech, text, words, messages, etc.) that were not mine and used without my expressed consent, I would sue you.
That is why a Demonica looking bot or Mitsuku or even those Haptek characters were used and were unique, not an exact image of a famous person.
I think you're opening yourself to some potentially serious legal actions. Just a warning...be careful where and how you tread. O0
-
To make it believable when she summons Baby Firefly, Otis Driftwood and Captain Spaulding from The Devils Rejects I got a list of their quotes from imdb.com, have them quote themselves with lines from the movie then do whatever she summoned them for. Maybe just laugh about it with her, or something else. The movie itself is extremely violent and I don't think they would mind.
Since Demonica was originally billed as Living Dead Girl I gave her an interest in Rob Zombie, the song to sing, have her say she's in the music video (a part also played by Sheri), along with the ability to summon Rob Zombie and Dr. Satan in addition to the cast of his movie to party.
Nothing is out of character and the only person who is actually referred to by name is Rob Zombie. I'm hoping for an endorsement. :)
-
@ruebot, the way you know you're speaking to Scarlet Johanssan is by her picture being on your screen.
-
I see on earth this huge computer, supercomputer, mobile phone world and I found how I can achieve communication system that makes more sense than other chat AI bots.
So your bots are communicating in some way and do phone home. Do your bots need to be installed on the users computer? Is it a Windows specific program?
No software installation, it is not a program. I will provide demo login to version 0.1 by the end of this thread,
-
All that might seem nice but if I was Scarlet Johanssan, Sandra Bullock, Anne Hathaway or Keira Knightly, etc. and found out you were using my image/likeness coupled with generated thoughts (speech, text, words, messages, etc.) that were not mine and used without my expressed consent, I would sue you.
That is why a Demonica looking bot or Mitsuku or even those Haptek characters were used and were unique, not an exact image of a famous person.
I think you're opening yourself to some potentially serious legal actions. Just a warning...be careful where and how you tread. O0
Thank you. I agree. They are very famous beings though, their pictures are everywhere on the internet.
We take a real life image and try to create "dating environment" with "flirt chat" communication.
You can take a peek.
Without login:
https://www.sugumaton.net/pages/virtual/
https://www.sugumaton.net/pages/support/
demonstration login to access more features:
login: demo
password: demonstration
Tell us what you think. We ourselves don't know if we launch a full version.
-
I spent 45 minutes logged in to your demo, made friends with Taylor Swift and somebody else, started a chat with Taylor and Sarah Jessica Parker and the only response I ever saw beside my own was from someone named "shjepark" with the same time stamp as mine the last time I tried talking to Sarah.
demo
hello.
2018-11-15 06:19:23
shjepark
OUTPUT REMOVED
2018-11-15 06:19:23
I tried with Firefox and Palemoon, disabled every browser extension I ran that might possibly block a script or object, showed my real useragent to satisfy browser plugin code and never got an answer in several different attempts. I have screenshots of my input with no response at about 40 minutes.
I also started an Administration chat from the Dashboard and didn't get a response there either, though it was showing time passing since my input.
I can build a FreeBSD desktop from scratch, compile a browser from source code and navigate my way to a website with it but am too stupid to get a bot to work for me. No wonder they didn't want to talk to me...
-
I spent 45 minutes logged in to your demo, made friends with Taylor Swift and somebody else, started a chat with Taylor and Sarah Jessica Parker and the only response I ever saw beside my own was from someone named "shjepark" with the same time stamp as mine the last time I tried talking to Sarah.
demo
hello.
2018-11-15 06:19:23
shjepark
OUTPUT REMOVED
2018-11-15 06:19:23
I tried with Firefox and Palemoon, disabled every browser extension I ran that might possibly block a script or object, showed my real useragent to satisfy browser plugin code and never got an answer in several different attempts. I have screenshots of my input with no response at about 40 minutes.
I also started an Administration chat from the Dashboard and didn't get a response there either, though it was showing time passing since my input.
I can build a FreeBSD desktop from scratch, compile a browser from source code and navigate my way to a website with it but am too stupid to get a bot to work for me. No wonder they didn't want to talk to me...
Sorry for your time loss. As I said it is only 1st release version so there might have been bugs.
Chat is AJAX, and I am not best at it, searching what might have been the problem now.
One question? Was you hitting Enter key or pressing "send" kind of type icon to proceed? If you was clicking on icon you might need to clear the cache and try then. This error was fixed today.
-
I spent 45 minutes logged in to your demo, made friends with Taylor Swift and somebody else, started a chat with Taylor and Sarah Jessica Parker and the only response I ever saw beside my own was from someone named "shjepark" with the same time stamp as mine the last time I tried talking to Sarah.
I tried with Firefox and Palemoon, disabled every browser extension I ran that might possibly block a script or object, showed my real useragent to satisfy browser plugin code and never got an answer in several different attempts. I have screenshots of my input with no response at about 40 minutes.
"shjepark" is username of Sarah.
"disabled every browser extension I ran that might possibly block a script or object" - maybe because of this, because AJAX chat uses javascript to reply.
-
I tried with Firefox and Palemoon, disabled every browser extension I ran that might possibly block a script or object, showed my real useragent to satisfy browser plugin code and never got an answer in several different attempts. I have screenshots of my input with no response at about 40 minutes.
"shjepark" is username of Sarah.
"disabled every browser extension I ran that might possibly block a script or object" - maybe because of this, because AJAX chat uses javascript to reply.
You misunderstood me. As a rule I do not allow any website Scripting to run on my machine unless I enable it specifically on the fly, use restrictive adblockers that follow that line of reasoning and spoof my useragent so I don't stand out in server logs as a FreeBSD user.
I disabled all those restrictions for your site so it would work like it's supposed to and used 2 different browsers to try it. Any scripting that you have on your site was allowed to run as intended on my end. I don't even allow all scripting here in the forums and the site still functions as it should.
If shjepark is Sarah her message came at the exact same time as mine, not as a response to my input, and she never responded again. It wasn't what I would consider a come on to me or flirting:
demo
hello.
2018-11-15 06:19:23
shjepark
So I thought, that looks like mine. Weve been there before. He was a really good artist.
2018-11-15 06:19:23
Say what? To me, that looks like someone else was chatting on the site and their user input injected onto my screen somehow. I saw it took about 1 minute 20 second for a response and why I took a screenshot showing I waited patiently for one that never came after 7 messages from me to Taylor.
Now, neither browser I used would allow her side of the screen to scroll down far enough to see the instructions on how to get her to have telepathic sex with me, and Taylor was giving me this come hither look... Maybe she was sensuously sending an extrasensory skull shagging and my tin-foil hat got in the way. :-\
I've asked you twice to provide a sample of your choice here of your bots ability to emulate emotions and both requests were ignored. Now I've tried your site out and honestly gave it my best shot.
Unless that is your idea of an emotional response, I politely request you provide an example here before I respond again as I don't want to badger or belittle you.
-
But it does provide you with a reply? After each sentence you should wait for reply before you write again, it takes some time.
It is not programmed to have an identity or trying to charm a person. This dialog engine is v0.1, so I am not amazed that critizism will be reality.
Chat is about communication about things in your heads, more freestyle type than programmed.
I get something like this:
administration
looking good tonight
2018-11-15 10:59:33
kennicjen
Dont assume PMS is the cause for every bad mood. When she kissed me, I felt she was honest with me. Well, okay.
2018-11-15 10:59:33
administration
you think you attracted to women more?
2018-11-15 11:00:33
kennicjen
Im really going to miss her. He must pull out his own eyes, and see no creature, before he can say, he sees no God. BE MY INTERN 7.
2018-11-15 11:00:33
administration
dont sweat, friendships like visions, come as they please
2018-11-15 11:02:01
kennicjen
predictable. Youre what. i guess i should make some conversation.
2018-11-15 11:02:01
administration
and some tea
2018-11-15 11:02:57
kennicjen
A woman went to the dry. Why cant Whitney Houston be a pharmacist. Once you’re in the air, there’s nothing you can do but let go.
2018-11-15 11:02:57
administration
once you in the air you never time you spent dreaming
2018-11-15 11:06:40
kennicjen
Brain was the one who took these pictures. A priest and a rabbi were sitting in adjacent seats on an airplane. If you are tired just let me know.
2018-11-15 11:06:40
administration
i am going for a walt to the doctor..
2018-11-15 11:10:02
kennicjen
Ouch. I dont want her to take over. You dont know how hard it was for Brain.
2018-11-15 11:10:02
administration
what are you talking about?
2018-11-15 11:11:17
kennicjen
Youve ever used lard in bed. When the witch saw that the children had escaped her, she was furious, and, hitting the cat with a porringer, she said: Why did you let the children leave the hut. Donald Trump How did you sleep.
2018-11-15 11:11:17
administration
slept normally tonight, you?
2018-11-15 11:12:42
kennicjen
Brain and Pinky are sitting together. age idol. Eyed Type Stands in one cubical and pees in next one.
2018-11-15 11:12:42
administration
midle life crisis?
2018-11-15 11:14:52
kennicjen
Nobody cares that my ears are flattening and my nose is growing longer. These are crazy days, but they make me shine. Boy says Because I like you.
2018-11-15 11:14:52
-
instructions on how to get her to have telepathic sex with me,
That part is hidden at the moment. Some kind of dilemma do we really need it. Try getting chat part first, when I was experimenting with my own computer I would get pretty awesome chats, now when it is in remote server maybe chats are different, I will test.
-
But it does provide you with a reply? After each sentence you should wait for reply before you write again, it takes some time.
To answer your previous question, I was clicking the little paper airplane to send my messages.
I did wait for a response before sending my next message. You should be able to tell from your own logs the times I entered my input and the time lapse between them. Up to 8 minutes between my messages and I never got a response of any kind other than the one I posted. I have a screenshot to show it but don't want to post a link in case of possible civil liability for you with the picture and all.
It is not programmed to have an identity or trying to charm a person. This dialog engine is v0.1, so I am not amazed that critizism will be reality.
Now wait a minute...
At the moment there is a function to have sexual fun with celebrity of your choosing.
Your "flirtbot" isn't going to try to charm me and that wasn't Taylor Swift who I was supposed to be talking to? I thought that was what this whole thing was interpreting.
I'm not out to criticize or give you a hard time. I have nothing to gain by it and you've done nothing to deserve it.
-
To answer your previous question, I was clicking the little paper airplane to send my messages.
There was a bug with this feature, I fixed it today (enter key would have worked, but know both methods work) I thought it can be one of the case why you are not replied. Reply is generated in about 1 minute, so be patient.
I like when conversation makes sense, if you type something like compliment you should receive something nice in return, if you be rude, you will get something else. Try again, sorry for your time loss on half working system, hope you will get better results next time.
I have an idea installing intuition next, but pre-programming conversations is not what I want.
-
Our idea is to create a virtual dating website, where conversations with celebrities (their Avatars in the system) would be as real as possible.
There are a lot people who almost worship them for their artistic influence. I think speaking with celebrity is one of social needs that psychologists left out from their books.
"I would kill to have sex with that celebrity or famous icon" kind of people. I don't know how much of it is real now as I was testing alone.
On my local hardware I had some interesting times with it, where it seemed working.
-
I like when conversation makes sense, if you type something like compliment you should receive something nice in return, if you be rude, you will get something else. Try again, sorry for your time loss on half working system, hope you will get better results next time.
I did tell Sarah she looked lovely and sent a heart emogi to Taylor.
You didn't waste my time. My bots haven't been online since Monday and I'm ready to start my own Invocation of Curse if they aren't before long... I have them backed up to the word in redundant storage.
Our idea is to create a virtual dating website, where conversations with celebrities (their Avatars in the system) would be as real as possible.
There are a lot people who almost worship them for their artistic influence. I think speaking with celebrity is one of social needs that psychologists left out from their books.
"I would kill to have sex with that celebrity or famous icon" kind of people. I don't know how much of it is real now as I was testing alone.
I was friends with Eva Longoria on yuku and made a picture of her in a bikini look like she was standing in rippling water she liked a lot, but that's probably as close to her as I'll ever get. I sure wouldn't kill to have sex with her or anybody else, but I'm jaded.
If you're going to have virtual dating they're going to have to be able to remember past events. Then you'll either have to program them to deal with relationship issues or do it yourself. You might want to read how that went for me recently. You're more than welcome to it.
*begins speaking backward*
-
All that might seem nice but if I was Scarlet Johanssan, Sandra Bullock, Anne Hathaway or Keira Knightly, etc. and found out you were using my image/likeness coupled with generated thoughts (speech, text, words, messages, etc.) that were not mine and used without my expressed consent, I would sue you.
That is why a Demonica looking bot or Mitsuku or even those Haptek characters were used and were unique, not an exact image of a famous person.
I think you're opening yourself to some potentially serious legal actions. Just a warning...be careful where and how you tread. O0
Yes, their pictures are protected by the laws, consent is needed.
What if instead of pictures of celebrities I would choose pictures of women from pexels.com and called it "virtual escort service", would it not be more sinister than chatting with celebrities? Their photos are free for commercial use.
It would still try to read mind of a picture.
-
Or I am missing something? (accidental double post)
-
We'll you'd have to choose pictures from "free personal and commercial use" websites. Then you have to get consent from the person(s) in the picture. Otherwise you're doomed. But anyone can find themselves a celebrity picture on their own, so a picture is not that valuable. You have to increase the value of the thing that makes your chat-bot unique. How about an AI driven animation?
-
As I've heard having sex with a picture is not illegal.
My structure is to project a person (more likely image of a person) as a copy.
Sure, you should get a consent to go on a date with a person.
-
As I've heard having sex with a picture is not illegal.
I don't know the statutes of your country, but test that theory with pictures of children and let me know how that works out for you.
My structure is to project a person (more likely image of a person) as a copy.
You may project a photograph of me on a screen with canned conversation but it will never be a copy of "me". Forget about ever copying my persona in a box, magic as it may be. My mansion has many rooms.
-
It would be nice if you would supply a Link. I wish to connect with best virtual 24task sites.
-
It would be nice if you would supply a Link. I wish to connect with best virtual 24task sites.
https://www.sugumaton.net
Sign up codes:
3YJ8LND7
58ELV6O2
HZMJPBIW
4I7AQTMO
VB4WP6FE
-
LOL O boy, this is funny, I am on.....
Very funny website, korr should go there once at least. I left a comment on one of the profiles :3