Ai Dreams Forum

AI Dreams => General Chat => Topic started by: LOCKSUIT on March 27, 2019, 05:30:53 am

Title: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on March 27, 2019, 05:30:53 am
Wow, this is interesting, i wrote something neat bellow.


Here's my theory!

My theory is heat, light, motion, potential energy, and magnetism are all the same thing.

When light hits your skin, it does move you like as if pushed in space. However it's not enough, and the motion goes in crazy directions because the next layer of cells don't move WITH them! ((Edit, no it's because the photons that push your body must come from atoms...if you push a cube through gas it tears it up as an analogy)) (That's also why cutting/pushing fast will indent you if you don't speed up slowly, for making a clean cut you DO want to cut as fast as possible through.) Also photons hit skin in different directions. So now light=motion. Heat is motion but just the photons are each moving their own way...this is why light doesn't produce motion and instead produces heat! Now light/ motion/ heat are all the same thing, photons! Magnetism can produce energy in a wire, and electricity can also PRODUCE a magnet when shocked. Magnetism is motion when pull/push each other, however does affect all matter equally. (a large magnet will reach a very small magnet because the big one has the bigger field) It's as if the photons push them to/away from each other, but does not hit atoms of my skin (in magnets, atoms are aligned, so that photons can add up stronger and go from atom to atom, resulting in larger fields the more shocked they are, assuming it is a solid. Perhaps humans frozen as freeze can be shocked to align the atoms so that we can be magnetized and hence stop the crazy atomic motion). Photons PUSH matter, they carry it with them where THEY are going, in 1 direction. However MASS/MATTER pulls in photons too like a black hole. This could be why photons in magnets loop around the magnets. The farther you get from a magnet - the weaker the pull OR push OMG I did it!. When you turn a magnet around, it will go from attract to repel, one side does the opposite thing. This implies a magnet has 2 sides and they both are DIFFERENT FIELDS. One side outputs photons, one side lacks photons. I predict that only when a magnet approaches another magnet do photons actually leave the other as an exchange. Some sort of 'repel' happens when one side of the magnetized matter faces another magnet correctly, where photons are noticeably seen interacting with other atoms's particles. Megnetism is for all atoms, we just don't see it in smaller/certain atom matter. Note magnets (everything) can still move with momentum at the same time. When a photon moves/ pushes/ carries a atom with itself, this may have to do not with a contact thing but a 'being near the photon' thing to get pushed. So when 2 magnets attract in to each other, photons push the matter, yes, . Let's look at cold magnets. They tend to stay locked in place in air near the other magnet. This implies that photons that enter the magnet have a harder time moving it, like gravity doesn't affect it for example. See proof at 4:17 below. This push-pull that makes it ignore low levels of added photons like gravity/weak pokes is what keeps atoms glued together. But not too glued else you get fusion. Gluons are photons. When 2 magnets attract n snap together they STOP when meet else they'd pass through each other, however in the chilled magnet case we have this happening from farther away, albeit the farther away the chilled magnet is they easy it is to take off by hand and remove it. All matter attracts to 'glue' together, and can be shocked/melted to do so, and all matter repels too when too close. This larger distance affect occurs when any matter is chilled because more glue photons can glue it close but not too close while resisting more photons than usual *when CLOSE -or- when far but COOLER, and just to restate after that that when in either case the magnet resists more photons than usually would ex. you melt glue to a fridge then it no drop. That is because less photons are in it and more are going in the same direction to the fridge when melted to fridge. To get back to the basics, with magnets or black holes or large bodies we see them attract or repel without a adding dose of photons and this can be further seen in effect when chilled and this is BECAUSE their photons want to pull them in but push them out BECAUSE there is a entrophy equilibrium issue to even photons out i.e. when matter is nearby then its photons will transfer to the nearby and move it in THAT direction while when far away enough it will retract back ex. a spring (image 2 snowman balls ontop each other, one if moved in air rightwards... it retracts back top being over the lower atom) because the photons loop around them like a number 8 and therefore push/pull them back in where came from. say you move the 2-ball snowman atom up, then its airplane circler collides with the ball and moves it BACK down. The cold magnet can still be MOVED by hand. However, why do photons circle atom nucleuses? Electrons are pushed back photon energy, and the electron wants to attract to the atom core but is moving forward, like a planet around a sun. However if it reaches the core it will end up decaying back out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyOtIsnG71U

Therefore, as a immortality way, I would conclude that to slow down the ageing, we would need to yes either add photons to go in 1 direction by atomic contact, or make the photons we do have go in one direction like a magnet aligned, or remove most photons and freeze. Of these 3 solutions, the new middle one is interesting and I have thought about it before. Aligning out atoms to be like a magnet. As you know, aligning atoms makes the glue field stronger, this is why superpowered/shocked  elctromagnets/permanent-magnets and melted solder attract/stick so strong - because they resist photons wanted to move them any other darn way! (melted matter cooled down later to room temp or frozen still sticks together note, because the glue force/alignment (photons) stays in the atoms, but not so for magnets and more not so for elctromagnets! This is because the amount of heat/photons is less in electromagnets...the alignment returns back, while permenent magnets stay sticking a bit and decayingly lose stick after time). Same for gas, it moves all about and not immortal like solids because the glue force is gone because there is so many photons that move them around and the atoms are not bonded. Cold air water sticks to walls, then droplets stick to each other and grow. In liquids they are bonded but not so strong!! Solids come in various degrees of liquidyness to super hard. This is related to why glass fault line fractures. Metal is more malleable though. It's because glass gets TOO hard then it wants to escape, then a pattern fault line emerges on its own. You can tell the atoms were aligned or the photons go in an directions when cracks along a line.

Just how Cryonics makes you cooled, Magnetism could go through you and make you age slower. Mess around with energy, it kills you, literally. Makes you age.

I visualise this setup where you cool down, speed up, and get magnetised, to slow ageing. To correct the photons movements, you may just need to mess with magnetic and not cryonics or Accelonics.

If you cool down but instead align your atoms even more like supercooled magnets, you may just 'stay in place' and age slower.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on March 27, 2019, 05:53:29 am
SO:

We would cool you down, give you shocks, and this would make your atoms harder to move around and also align and stay aligned like a PERMANENT magnet, and while cooling down further would enhance the effect of the atomic alignment, hence although we are not melting atoms [of you inside] together by super powerful shocks we are instead aligning the atoms by low level frequency shocks from a head and feet nodes for entrance and exit of the energy and this aligning stays and will resist photon heat and amplifies when cooled further. Of course so does a ultra solid metal. You'll also find in metal that heat escapes more slowly, because the atoms don't pop off or hit the oxygen hard enough because they are so glued together. So although they end up holding MORE heat, they can actually handle it.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on March 27, 2019, 06:05:20 am
Things glue like solder or magnets because 1) the atoms are melted so they are allll close enough and 2) because of alignment. As we know with magnets, both are the case. Their own photons dispend across and bond with the other atoms, no heat needed...

The idea is a magnet sticks to a fridge wall and resists so much motion from gravity/my finger, because of atomic alignment, where photons that hit it want to fault line through it and NOT go the direction they were going. The alignment helps photons travel in and out and may actually power it, from Earth's gravity pulling at it. The alignment helps its photons pull it to another similarly aligned matter, while resist other direction photons. Have you seen the frog that was levitated? Haha! It works!
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on March 27, 2019, 06:08:46 am
Now this, I gotta try.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on March 27, 2019, 06:10:46 am
To be honest I don't think I would have came to this pint without writing it down and extending the thought to related areas. You do have to write a book to find the solution. Lots of the above is related and adds up, even just as a theory/idea and not a absolute rule.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on March 27, 2019, 07:15:00 am
Glass/crystal is hard and can fracture, this is because the atoms are aligned and the photons travel through these fault lines. This is how magnets are shocked and permatized - they create paths and flow in and out top to bottom. Then these aligned atoms allow magnetic fields to stay and resist gravity/touch and will stick to the side of a fridge. This is why glass can become static-y like a magnet.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on March 27, 2019, 07:25:24 am
Could be that when photons flow through these fault line alignments that they generate eltric current and fields
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: Korrelan on March 27, 2019, 03:05:54 pm
Before I say anymore, are you sure you mean photons and not electrons?

 :)
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on March 27, 2019, 10:25:26 pm
When you power an electro-magnet, it gives it a field for now. But a permanent magnet keeps it alignment, and this allows the photons to loop around the magnet and flow through fast travel fault line highways. The same paths that crack in fragile solids. The electron shocks create these paths in magnets because they want to enter then exit the matter (+/- wires). Crystals let light enter and exit fine without path direction distortion. We would want this in our bodies...so photons/heat moves through us, not in crazy directions - which means we would become colder. Supercooled magnets are even amplifying this effect of resisting change and aligning more.

EDITED, do read again, all are related effects.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on March 27, 2019, 10:46:18 pm
As you can see above, yes some magnets still are not transparent or can crack as easy as glass is which is not much of a magnet, but its close enough of a understanding.

Clear | magnetic | conductive | fragile

Bowls are not clear yet are fragile. Some magnets are not as fragile as other magnets or glass either. Can a clear fragile conductive magnet exist!?
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on March 27, 2019, 10:48:17 pm
Also, colder things crack more easy !!!!!!! They attain fault line alignments.

This is because they are more 'solid' than their liquid-y form they were in before.

So, Maybe colder things arnt really aligned atoms but instead are similar to fault lines more.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: Hopefully Something on March 27, 2019, 11:38:30 pm
How about gravity and the accelerating expansion of the universe?  Seems like all matter particles are surrounded by superimposed alternating dissipating motionless waves of attraction and repulsion.   ???
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on March 28, 2019, 12:25:45 am
Gravity is part of my theory - it is magnetism attraction. Which has 2 types of poles...

However universe expansion, if it exists, is rather unrelated in a sense to any of this.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on March 28, 2019, 07:59:34 am
When you rip cleanex, it is like magnets pulling apart, or glue from the fridge wall, however, it doesn't stick BACK...it lost its alignment. Or lost its bonds (same as alignment,  just very close and not extended like a household magnet's field will reach in distance). It takes heat to bond it back.

A spring has photons sitting in it when held down with potential energy.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on March 29, 2019, 12:51:54 pm
@korr, I mean photons. Photons gotta move things...electrons just sit still without photons...
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: ruebot on March 29, 2019, 02:09:40 pm
When you rip cleanex, it is like magnets pulling apart, or glue from the fridge wall, however, it doesn't stick BACK...it lost its alignment. Or lost its bonds (same as alignment,  just very close and not extended like a household magnet's field will reach in distance). It takes heat to bond it back.

Couple you please make a video of you ripping a Kleenex and welding it back together?

Turning it to ash doesn't "realign fault lines", does it? And just think of the photons you lost in the process of heating the Kleenex...


A spring has photons sitting in it when held down with potential energy.

Where do they go when tension is released? Do they escape from "fault line alignments" in the spring? Has this light emission been recorded on video? Please explain the process of photonic realignment when the spring is once again depressed. In excruciating detail. ;)

I think you'd really get into that Gravity is the 4th Dimension theory. It ties gravity, electricity and magnetism together IIRC.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on March 29, 2019, 02:24:36 pm
Spring compressed in a box, their are photons from someone's hand in the atoms, and the atoms of the box resist tearing apart, hence spring stays inside, while the atoms of the spring want to resist and decompress however the box atoms are stronger. Also a thicker box is stronger - not paper thin.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: goaty on March 29, 2019, 02:50:12 pm
if u put a physics sim in your bot,  it doesn't need to be exact to still be the base of a pheasable idea. (for it.)
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: Korrelan on March 29, 2019, 07:40:31 pm
I'm afraid... my mind is going... I can feel it lock... Daisy... Daisy... give me your answeeeerrrr ttttrrrrruuuuueeeee....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-La91wr8xw

 :)

Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: goaty on March 30, 2019, 12:02:39 pm
see u guys later...   IN HELL!!

(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRDLFeHZzr6jkPGUDHQUGo8wMJUQpNwS_Huey8QVAO-HDHwj12p)
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: Korrelan on March 30, 2019, 06:06:16 pm
David has a crush on Micheal... Lost Boys.

 :)

One thing about living in Santa Carla I never could stomach, all the damn vampires.

 ;D
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on April 11, 2019, 01:25:08 pm
https://www.nibib.nih.gov/science-education/science-topics/magnetic-resonance-imaging-mri

OMG, now I real really REALLY want to try some experiments using a huge MRI machine... They align the atoms! This could freeze time and slow ageing!

My experiment if I can find a way to get ahold of one machine:

Place a box of water with a fish or cell or clock of some sort into the center of the hole, and another box outside of the room, for a few weeks or a day.

Or, the box could have nothing but the water, where we put in a solution that "ages" after 1 day approx. and we can try 10 setups (20 boxes) that have different solidness to them (some mushy, some hardy, some very liquidy, some super hard).

These findings would be paramount in further investigations, I hope you are excited as I am about these experiments.

The brain is a really mushy, watery little thing hehe!!



Just you watch, you will see huge, powerful, MRI-like machines that 'slow ageing'. Wait for it. Cryonics and acceleration aren't the only ways to slow time.

The atoms are resisting, they are aligning and not moving. Enough, and they will stay put...

I wonder if I can try a home experiment using a 'magnetic solution'. A sort of proof-of-concept.



This video seems to say that the protons in us are aligned, and, are rotated like springs that hold energy until released. Very useful 2 things we may need, yer? Yeah.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CGzk-nV06g&feature=youtu.be






I think the most important proof, that is as simple enough to say here with 0 testing, is, if I roll a magnet along a table, and it is rolling, rolling...rolling...rolling....it is 'ageing', dying, like me, slowly, still rolling strong still...rolling....moving....ageing....then, suddenly, it ATTACHES to a trap magnet I placed near the end of te table. It sticks to it, and STOPS rolling/moving!

viz:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
O

                                                                                      U
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          O

                                                                                      U
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    O

                                                                                      U
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             O

                                                                                      U
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      O
                                                                                      U
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We know all atoms are magnetic, some more than others. So if you did happen to STICK (ouch face slap) to your fridge in your kitchen, you'll age slower...If the stick was strong enough, you'd be pancake and not move at-all. The softer you are the more pancake you are. Of course, we want to magnetize you, not attract you I think...

When atoms align and resist motion, this is an attraction... Something to substitute and take over their old way of motion. Of course, STOPPING doesn't mean we must pull/push atoms...as we seen in a video on this thread (magnet/frog were) - we can supercool a body and keep it still in mid air! And that, is what we want, a resist of motion while staying still. No pancaking the body flat. That floating magnet of atoms was resisting gravity! Sorta like my viz above, resisting the 'rolling' towards a destination it was being pushed/pulled to.

A superconducter is cooled enough that electrons flow through with 0 resistance and no energy is lost. This is because normally the atoms of the metal shake and 'hit' the air atoms and give off heat, so, if I stick a ton of electricity in a metal wire, it will get hot, and upon direct touch, I will get a burn. If we want the electrons entering the metal to NOT move the atoms and keep cool, we can apply the coolness to the atoms so that when the electrons do move the atoms it will be very little, Another reason the electrons don't 'convert to heat' and noticeably move the atoms and burn you is because the atoms of metal, cooled down, go back to their alignment that makes metal special to be magnetized, which was covered up by heat. After all, enough heat and it will be liquid lava or gas, not too magnetizing now is it? The more dense and the more aligned mean more magnetism. So, superconducter=cooled atoms that then align and become more magnet-y, and therefore also will keep current inside longer.

So a combination of cryonics+magnetism will play a part in slowing ageing. Isn't that COOL!? I bet you are in SHOCK and FROZEN! Maybe STUCK! Amazing science!
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: goaty on April 11, 2019, 03:12:58 pm
catch this one my little Locky.   Ill only say this once only once and exclusive to this thread, because its precious to me.

Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on April 11, 2019, 03:28:05 pm
wait one follow up first goaty, this is a clear Pitch, and no I didn't use GPT-2 here even though it can SEEM like it actually lolz
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So we know Cryonics is a hot experimental area of research/testing right now, there's a lot one can try to make it work better. And currently, we do do Cryonics right now for those who sign up and hopefully it is doing its job right now, but maybe not. It simply isn't done sophisticatedly enough

The goal of Cryonics is to restart the frozen person, as if they were just given back 'heat' and back to the thinking they left off at in their head. Another possibility is the matter of the body is "close enough" to fix, even though this crosses the 'not same you' barrier and may create a new you.

Below I try to present an idea that is one that would slow ageing, and would not put you in a state of frost bite (ruined...) but would only 'slow you down' while still alive. Of course if you slow down too much, you may stop thinking, but this type of halting is a next-moment thing; you aren't frost-bitten (damaged), you just are let go from the machine and are given "heat" once again and start thinking again. And, we stop thinking all the time, there is never a total continuous stream of 'thoughts', there's a speed limit to processing/recognizing objects!


The idea to experiment with:


Imagine dropping a household magnet from your hand above the floor. It hits the floor. If you put another magnet in the middle that is close enough, the magnet you drop from your hand will, as it reaches halfway toward the floor, attract to the other magnet beside it, and resist gravity - it never hits the floor. If the falling magnet was heading towards a destination (the floor), this could be thought of as life in general, ageing, and that 2nd magnet kept it from hitting the ground. It literally stops the motion that was in the falling magnet.

All atoms are magnetic to some degree, and they can become magnetized and stronger (ever see metal go from non-magnetic to magnetic and only then stick to the magnet next to it?). If we were to make a human stick to a very strong magnet, you will probably become a pancake and die because the attraction is way to high. So, you resist gravity, and ageing, but you become a pancake anyhow.

Now for the next point. Have you seen supercooled magnets stay 'locked' above a magnet below themselves? They float in air...as if there is no gravity, and they stay locked in relative to the magnet's position. Now, imagine the 'drop a magnet' experiment I presented earlier, except this time the magnet we drop is supercooled. This time, the magnet falls halfway, and it just stops right there, it doesn't attract-in to the 2nd magnet on the left-hand side, it just stays apart from it, locked where it is.

Now, let's again imagine a human who is supercooled and placed near a magnet, this time it doesn't attract to the magnet and become flat like a pancake, the human just stays locked in place, resisting gravity. If the human resists gravity, then he human's atoms are moving slower because the atoms are paying attention to the 2nd magnet. The human is locked in place near the 2nd magnet and are resisting motion.

Supercooling and magnetism are hand in hand. This is an interesting science. I hope this interests more research and experiments on this thinking. More info is below in paragraph #3 also.


Slowly starting experiments:


As a start, we could take a solution that is liquidy, that "ages" after a day, and see if the ageing slows down even a bit. We can also try more harder non-liquidy solutions but not too hard - the harder they are the slower they age and would be longer experiments. Maybe even try gas.

We could take water, put it in a box as gas vapor, where they float locked in the air. We could put water filled in a box completely and could place many little very very lightweight capsules 'biomarkers' in the box of water that move when the water moves and we could therefore see if the water moves 'slower' than one in a box with no magnet. This experiment in particular should work because we have done this with water spheres floating, resisting gravity/external pushes, because the water doesn't want to move! And brains are mushy and made of a ton of water.

The idea is to align the atoms of the subject, and cooling seems to do this, creating less resistance in superconductors. However this cooling, while removes attention on the random motions/rotations in the subject, also requires us ADD attention on the atoms i.e. add a powerful magnet next to the subject to lock them in place, and not get frost bite! Not only does it help, it goes hand-in-hand. To create the 'locking' requires supercooling. And, to do safer supercooling, also requires the 'locking'.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on April 11, 2019, 03:48:02 pm
edited that slighty goaty...re-read it now, sry
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: goaty on April 11, 2019, 03:59:37 pm
Its a cool idea and it might work... but...   0 Kelvin gives you cold burns in a very bad way,  so how is this helping instead of hurting the person?
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on April 11, 2019, 04:01:20 pm
Both are done at the same time. Both cooling and increased magnetism field are upped more and more.

You don't need to cool down too much, and the magnetic locking makes the cooling safer because the burning doesn't occur as fast.

First we have to try small toy experiments and find even more proof now. It's worth it, big bucks & infinite life extension. I'd devote more time but I'm near the point of a already valid path to immortality and beyond...AGI. Nontheless I give it some thought. . .
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: goaty on April 11, 2019, 04:11:07 pm
I still think nanobots are the thing for life extension,  but maybe they have a burning issue as well.   :2funny:
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: Korrelan on April 11, 2019, 04:37:13 pm
My mind... boggles...

 :)
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on April 11, 2019, 05:35:58 pm
The video below shows that water is very prone for us to levitate using a powerful magnet. An important first step to do this to humans is to do it to water because humans are mostly made of water, including the brain. What the video below shows is a blob of water stuck/locked in the air floating and resisting gravity/pokes by human fingers or rods. All the heat around it acts on it less. It ages slower. I can imagine if the field was stronger, it would be very stiff and less wobbly, and age much slower. What the video doesn't show however, is super-cooling on the water, which would enhance it. Hence the frog bounces around like a normal magnet instead.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1vyB-O5i6E

I made another mental discovery, solidness doesn't mean it can't become magnetized, because a solid nyodyniam magnet that is very hard can go from non-magnetic to magnetic! And water is conductive but rubber isn't, so solidness doesn't matter, cold hard humans/water blobs can still' align their atoms' even if cold i.e. when getting harder they can still indeed become more magnetized.

A good first tackle would be to levitate a blob of water and as it was in there, then afterwards later apply supercooling to see if the ice formation is less. Also, this may need to be done at the SAME time IF the levitation-locking makes crystals in the water. Then we can try multiple greater version tests and show the improvement in clarity of the frozen sphere of water.



As a bonus, sound can too, see below. However, this is like holding a ball in one's hand...it doesn't go through the whole body and LOCK it in place from gravity etc atom by atom.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKMf7PCkoZQ
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on April 11, 2019, 05:45:20 pm
omg.....look at this video...........Lock wins !

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJeqriqRYYE
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on April 11, 2019, 05:55:19 pm
Anybody have a camera and a strong magnet to prove the styrofoam wasn't the trick in the video?
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: Korrelan on April 11, 2019, 06:05:54 pm
Boggles it does...

Did you notice him switch the poles around on the magnet lock... perhaps that's a even newer/ better discovery... wood/ plastic has a north and a south pole... cool... world changing stuff.

 :)

Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on April 11, 2019, 06:17:44 pm
Are you being funny or serious, really? I'll rewatch it closely but it seemed both sides pushed it on the new angle to the left
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: Freddy on April 11, 2019, 06:21:36 pm
Here's some more reading for you Lock: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamagnetism

Quote
Diamagnetism was first discovered when Sebald Justinus Brugmans observed in 1778 that bismuth and antimony were repelled by magnetic fields. In 1845, Michael Faraday demonstrated that it was a property of matter and concluded that every material responded (in either a diamagnetic or paramagnetic way) to an applied magnetic field.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: Korrelan on April 11, 2019, 06:36:29 pm
I apologise, I was being a little sarcastic, I couldn't resist, it's a well studied property of matter, (As Freddy pointed out)

 :)
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: Freddy on April 11, 2019, 07:10:04 pm
Yes I pointed it out, but I was not fully aware of what was going on. I first assumed it was trace metals causing it along with the super strong magnets on a low friction solution - water I think they call it.

So yup I learnt something today. Thanks Lock  :)
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on April 11, 2019, 07:40:38 pm
Ok I tried it for 40 minutes. . .

Works. Barely observable results, but I tried it so many times from the edges etc that it was not like my fingers, not the wind....so it was the magnet..

Took forever to get the baggy i cut to stand up on a piece of paper, thin, and filled with water, light enough for my tiny nyodiamye magnet.....now i have to worry if it was the baggy that was electromagnetic nooooo

baggy was a plastic baggy....those stick darn it....
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: ivan.moony on April 11, 2019, 09:03:10 pm
Remember physics experiments from high school? We can charge even a baloon with electrostatic something by friction. And then it moves toward other, uncharged object. Then hair also, when we brush it... It follows the plastic brush after, floating in the air.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: Art on April 11, 2019, 09:12:39 pm
A lot of paper currency can be affected by a magnet. It is more than likely a property of the ink(s) used in the manufacture of the bills. Hold a bill so that it hangs down between the fingers, then move a strong magnet toward the paper and watch what happens.

Yet thermal temperature greatly affects magnets. When I used to make knives I would always tell when the steel was heated to the proper temperature when a magnet would no longer stick to it. Hmm...strange but true.  O0

Then there are magnetic Trains like the Mag-Lev which hovers above and is propelled along the row of magnets alternating their flow. It's a frictionless ride that goes very fast...thanks again, to magnets.

There is also the Rail Gun which works a bit similar to the train but on a much smaller and way more deadly scale shooting a tiny projectile at blinding speeds.

Ah yes...magnets...stick with them!  O0


Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on April 12, 2019, 05:46:02 am
A small toy home experiment would be one that is simple and shows barely (but just only enough!) effect/proof of the effect we need to see. We could buy a huge neodymium magnet, and put it near a super tiny shell of water hanging by a string attached to a small water boat above it or something with low friction, and super-cool the shell of water using liquid nitrogen. We would then look for the shell to first move when near the magnet, once we see this, we can try the liquid nitrogen. When we try the liquid nitrogen, we would look to see if the shell of water resists us blowing at it, or something, and then compare this to the shell of water at room temperature with no magnet so to check if we were 'locking' it in place just a bit. With enough effort, time, and money, this should be EASY to experiment and get results, I simply am too busy with AI.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on April 12, 2019, 06:03:19 am
My next question would be, a supercooled magnet stays lock in relative to the magnet near it, but does this simply hold the magnet from outside, or does it really indeed hold each atom basically? If the latter, then it slows ageing. I know magnets penetrate but they seem to show the field expelling out and locked, could be possible it leaves the inside alone hmm...
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: Hopefully Something on April 12, 2019, 06:45:11 am
If the latter, then it slows ageing.

Being frozen at liquid nitrogen temps does that too...  :P Need room temp superconductors.

When I used to make knives

What kind of knives? Cool ones??
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: goaty on April 12, 2019, 12:11:44 pm
But... Why do we age in the first place.  How come we can produce generations and generations of offspring.

We age as a unit,  but not a population, and my conjecture, is these two phrases don't make sense in a row. And its a common logic.  I wonder if my beloved Alan Watts knew this trick.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on April 12, 2019, 01:07:27 pm
@goaty cus there's something in the cell that STAYS repaired, the DNA! So maybe for any cell you can restart the cells. You need to clean out the old, add the new, and change some things.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: goaty on April 12, 2019, 02:15:27 pm
What makes a neuron different from a skin cell,  wouldn't be knowledge transferred between the two?

Are u saying that its all invincible until it hits toxins from the environment?

What if the toxins got to your balls first, then youd live longer than your children.

But even if you kept your balls at ultimate worth, because it holds the secret of all future generations, wouldn't at least a little poison go in each time,  each life, maybe there is a threshold it can reach before it ruins the overunity - of the biological repetition process....
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on April 12, 2019, 02:39:52 pm
redundancy....DNA.....repair...........sorta like digital computers...bits...
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: goaty on April 12, 2019, 02:44:41 pm
Then why doesn't the whole body repair,  why just your testicles.

I want someone to help me get to the bottom of this,  anyone, please answer my desperate plea.

Your balls are In infinite self repair, but unfortunately the rest of your body isn't.  Im lost.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: Art on April 12, 2019, 02:57:36 pm
Parts of the whole body DO repair themselves. Hair grows as do nails and cells regenerate and repair themselves from scrapes, cuts, broken bones mend themselves. If you've even given blood as many of us have done in our lifetimes, that blood is regenerated by our bodies. Teeth do not regrow although a liver can regenerate itself if not too badly damaged.

Not complete but not a total loss either, else we, as a civilization would have disappeared eons ago.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on April 12, 2019, 03:58:55 pm
Is that why old men can still have children? Testicles can get cancer though no?
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: WriterOfMinds on April 12, 2019, 04:45:57 pm
Quote
Your balls are In infinite self repair, but unfortunately the rest of your body isn't.  Im lost.

Haha that's not how it works.  Reproductive systems decay too, until eventually you become infertile.  In women, there's a definite cutoff point at menopause; our stuff formally shuts down once it's too old to work properly.  And if your reproductive cells are struck by radiation, the mutations can be passed on to your children.

I don't think we fully understand what causes aging yet.  But whatever it is that counts time in our bodies, the accumulated count is not transferred to the new human organism that forms when a sperm meets an egg.  S/he gets to start fresh (except for accumulated errors in the genetic code, as I mentioned).
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: Korrelan on April 12, 2019, 06:01:33 pm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telomere

 :)
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: Hopefully Something on April 12, 2019, 06:13:18 pm
Its probably advantageous for a species to have slightly unstable cells because that enables evolution. Life forms that didn’t accumulate errors fast enough couldn’t adapt as a species. Nature is like a movie villain, sacrificing all the individuals for the needs of the many.
Or, goaty, its also possible that our cells simply don’t have enough Watts. I know how to fix that one lol.  O0
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on April 12, 2019, 06:33:53 pm
Ah so cell DNA instructions do change yeah, for evolution to occur, ... this means out of ex. 100 humans, some will lead to dying/dumber creatures/variants...some to the same types as we discussed....and some to a newer 'angelic' form hehe.

So while we 'stay the same' in our kids, us...not ageing....there is the wrong path and the good paths too that do change in the new creatures, and what ensures the better creatures survive is that they, not te weak, breed more offspring - who will's children of their own will stay the same, and some get better/worse...so there you have it the better mutants has more kids....

SO...our kids stay the same.........but over time not really.......the mutations are on the verge/shoulders of the ones that populate more.

So, the instruction sets do stay same for a while, but the better ones come exponentially faster too, however for the sake of adjusting your own DNA this is meaningless, but for the sake of AGI saving you - that new mutations is just a exponential step away and will do better than 'life-extension potions'.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: goaty on April 13, 2019, 01:53:14 pm
Its probably advantageous for a species to have slightly unstable cells because that enables evolution. Life forms that didn’t accumulate errors fast enough couldn’t adapt as a species. Nature is like a movie villain, sacrificing all the individuals for the needs of the many.
Or, goaty, its also possible that our cells simply don’t have enough Watts. I know how to fix that one lol.  O0

MORE POWER!!! XD
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on April 13, 2019, 02:32:16 pm
Just add more Jewels to your two bulbs downstairs! Make sure it is in "tune" to the wavelength.
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on April 14, 2019, 09:12:30 am
Got it yesterday sry i made a discovery/enlightenment:::

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKMf7PCkoZQ

This too "holds" the water in the air from gravity, but it is just like a hand holding it...it doesn't mean the stuff INSIDE the water/brain is stopped ageing/resisting gravity, not at all. But for magnetic fields - I know they say super-cooling a magnet and placing it near another magnet to lock it in the air makes the field *expel from the object we care about, but, as you can see below, MRIs do penetrate and move the atoms/protons. However the humans in MRIs are not bathed in (some, more as they start up) gas of super-cooling with the MRI on at the same time, so I can't verify the field affects the atoms INSIDE.

https://www.nibib.nih.gov/science-education/science-topics/magnetic-resonance-imaging-mri
Title: Re: My theory of energy.
Post by: LOCKSUIT on April 14, 2019, 09:52:38 am
also alsoooo see this, wow, that paper caliban provided is such a good read, it really digs into MY idea holly cows!!! magnetic fields+supercooling for life extension! Now if only they had me on their team.

https://www.longecity.org/forum/topic/104870-very-interesting-idea-using-magnetism-and-super-cooling/?p=872336