[LOCKSUIT]

Hey spydaz, is this what your idea does/is? See attachment. It hears a sentence, and, when it hears another sentence with some similar stuff - it says hey these two got the same beginning I know where to splice them up at.  ?

[spydaz]

Hey spydaz, is this what your idea does/is? See attachment. It hears a sentence, and, when it hears another sentence with some similar stuff - it says hey these two got the same beginning I know where to splice them up at.  ?

The reality is that you can choose the rule-set you require; for the task that you need. As in your diagram ....lol... The tree could split sentences every second word... why not .... it still would produce some interesting sets of data into some kind of interesting structure.

[LOCKSUIT]

I pretty much verified my standing in some sketches in the past few days that your program (or related ideas) cannot do what I'm seeking for.

Your program/idea cannot learn to make a splice here "The thing they are | is cats.". Tell me why your program would avoid the splices here: "The thing they | are is | cats.". :P

[spydaz]

I pretty much verified my standing in some sketches in the past few days that your program (or related ideas) cannot do what I'm seeking for.

Your program/idea cannot learn to make a splice here "The thing they are | is cats.". Tell me why your program would avoid the splices here: "The thing they | are is | cats.".

NonSensical

[LOCKSUIT]

I'll try to be clearer.

I want a program that sees/says hey/realizes that the following sentence should have a splice/gap/separation where shown:
"The thing they are     is cats."

But the program must never ever think or say or learn that these are the atomic parts:
"The thing they     are is     cats."

Does/can your program do that.

Keep in mind it's not about the structure of the moment/given sentence, it's about the features of any text. That example sentence could be 5 times long and make no difference to where splices/separation occurs.